PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIOIX vs. GILHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund (GIOIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIOIX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than GILHX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GIOIX has outperformed GILHX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while GILHX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.09% annualized return.


GIOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
4.33%

GILHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.43%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIOIX
Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund
1.12%7.64%7.78%9.69%-9.57%1.71%11.09%2.25%0.46%5.32%
GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
0.98%6.02%6.00%7.28%-4.90%0.00%6.51%2.21%1.66%2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GIOIX and GILHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.64

The correlation between GIOIX and GILHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIOIX vs. GILHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIOIX
GIOIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GIOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GIOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GILHX
GILHX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GILHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GILHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund (GIOIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIOIXGILHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.64

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

4.18

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.85

18.47

-4.62

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the GILHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIOIX and GILHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIOIXGILHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.53

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.36

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.50

1.68

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

1.68

+0.05

Drawdowns

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIOIX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, which is greater than GILHX's maximum drawdown of -8.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIOIX and GILHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIOIXGILHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-8.10%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-1.13%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.12%

-1.13%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.38%

-8.10%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.38%

-8.10%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.08%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-0.70%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.26%

+0.18%

Volatility

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund (GIOIX) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) at 0.60%. This indicates that GIOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIOIXGILHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.60%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

1.36%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

1.87%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.18%

2.23%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.89%

1.85%

+1.04%

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIOIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GILHX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIOIX vs. GILHX - Dividend Comparison

GIOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than GILHX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILHX
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund
4.56%4.43%4.38%4.31%2.05%1.79%2.25%2.31%2.35%2.39%3.07%3.54%
GIOIX
Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund
6.09%5.86%5.88%6.45%3.78%3.10%3.61%3.29%3.55%3.54%5.38%5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIOIX and GILHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIOIX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to GILHX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIOIX dropped -13.38% vs GILHX's -8.10%.

GILHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIOIX and GILHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer