GINN vs. PXQ

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ).

GINN and PXQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GINN is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2020. PXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Networking Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both GINN and PXQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GINN vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GINN vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	-5.69%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	9.84%
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF	6.37%	28.65%	19.41%	27.39%	-29.54%	21.83%	16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a -5.69% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 6.37% return.

GINN

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.41%
• YTD: -5.69%
• 6M: -7.04%
• 1Y: 17.07%
• 3Y*: 15.51%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: —

PXQ

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 6.37%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 41.43%
• 3Y*: 24.34%
• 5Y*: 12.44%
• 10Y*: 16.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PXQ's 0.63% expense ratio.

PXQ

Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF

GINN

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

Return for Risk

GINN vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 42
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PXQ

PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 87
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.78	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.49	-1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	3.26	-1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	15.08	-10.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GINN vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and PXQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.78	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.55	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.49	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and PXQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GINN vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than PXQ's 0.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.34%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF	0.88%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Drawdowns

GINN vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and PXQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	PXQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-57.18%	+15.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-9.99%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	-34.55%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.37%	-4.51%	-4.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-10.82%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	2.80%	+1.11%

Volatility

GINN vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 6.51%, while Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	PXQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	8.11%	-1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	15.53%	-2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	23.35%	-2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.28%	22.86%	-1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	22.72%	-1.55%