PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQ vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQ vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 40.12% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 20.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 18.83%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.84% annualized return.


PXQ

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.96%
6M
31.73%
YTD
40.12%
1Y
63.92%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
13.22%

FTEC

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.38%
6M
21.39%
YTD
20.47%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
18.05%
10Y*
23.84%
ALL TIME*
21.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$82.97M$78.72M$94.67M
$741.37K$822.66K$837.91K

PXQ vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
40.12%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
20.47%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and FTEC is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.81

The correlation between PXQ and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQ vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PXQ vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXQFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.97

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

5.31

+8.02

PXQ vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-34.95%

-22.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-16.26%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-27.30%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-34.95%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-34.95%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-10.03%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-5.59%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

6.02%

-1.34%

Volatility

PXQ vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 8.49%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

8.49%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.68%

20.19%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.67%

24.35%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

25.87%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.55%

24.98%

-1.43%

PXQ vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQ vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than FTEC's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.37%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.68%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQ and FTEC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQ has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to FTEC (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.84% vs 18.83% for PXQ. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PXQ.

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.37% for FTEC.

PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.08% for FTEC.

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQ and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer