PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GINN vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GINN vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
-5.69%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%-0.28%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
14.33%7.95%-8.74%-23.86%-27.23%-18.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a -5.69% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 14.33% return.


GINN

1D
0.04%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-5.69%
6M
-7.04%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*

KROP

1D
-0.63%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
14.33%
6M
13.44%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
-5.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GINN vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GINN and KROP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNKROPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.94

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.56

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

3.68

+1.02

GINN vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and KROP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.94

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.60

+0.93

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and KROP is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GINN vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than KROP's 2.39% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.34%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.39%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%0.00%

Drawdowns

GINN vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and KROP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-61.96%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-11.29%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.37%

-49.92%

+40.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-44.33%

+30.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.78%

-0.87%

Volatility

GINN vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.21%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GINNKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

5.21%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

12.17%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

19.29%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

22.42%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

22.42%

-1.25%