GINN vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GINN returned 25.65% vs 23.78% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

GINN vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GINN having a 8.64% return and CRTC slightly lower at 8.59%.

GINN

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	8.64%	20.25%	18.71%	10.66%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and CRTC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.90

The correlation between GINN and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GINN	CRTC
Technology	32.4%	33.5%
Healthcare	18.6%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	6.3%
Financial Services	11.4%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.8%	16.0%
Industrials	6.1%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	0.0%
Utilities	1.9%	6.0%
Energy	1.4%	7.1%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	0.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

GINN vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.87	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.56	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.64	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	9.88	-2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GINN vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.87	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.36	-0.91

Drawdowns

GINN vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-19.07%	-22.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-9.05%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.27%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-2.13%	-11.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	2.41%	+1.23%

Volatility

GINN vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	3.20%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	9.64%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	12.76%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	15.73%	+5.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	15.73%	+5.32%

GINN vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than CRTC's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.16%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and CRTC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GINN and CRTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GINN or CRTC?

GINN has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, GINN or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, GINN leads with 25.65% vs 23.78% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINN or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, GINN has performed better with a 25.65% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or CRTC?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.00% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between GINN and CRTC?

GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.