GINN vs. AIVC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index while AIVC tracks the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GINN returned 7.37%/yr vs 21.08%/yr for AIVC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.

Performance

GINN vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 81.87% return.

GINN

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: —

AIVC

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 34.83%
• YTD: 81.87%
• 6M: 82.02%
• 1Y: 159.88%
• 3Y*: 52.10%
• 5Y*: 21.08%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	10.05%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	9.84%
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	81.87%	39.94%	18.22%	39.28%	-38.91%	-7.23%	17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and AIVC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020	0.85

The correlation between GINN and AIVC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. AIVC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GINN	AIVC
Technology	32.4%	91.2%
Healthcare	18.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	4.2%
Financial Services	11.4%	0.8%
Communication Services	10.8%	4.6%
Industrials	6.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Utilities	1.9%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

GINN vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 48
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	AIVC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	5.42	-3.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	5.40	-2.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.72	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	11.47	-9.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	38.92	-30.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GINN vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 5.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	AIVC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	5.42	-3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.70	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.65	-0.18

Drawdowns

GINN vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and AIVC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	AIVC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-56.11%	+14.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-14.11%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	-32.55%	+10.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	-53.58%	+12.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-16.44%	+3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	4.16%	-0.52%

Volatility

GINN vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is 3.66%, while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that GINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	AIVC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	10.73%	-7.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	23.65%	-11.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.01%	29.67%	-13.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.32%	30.20%	-8.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	26.93%	-5.88%

GINN vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than AIVC's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.09%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.15%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and AIVC in my portfolio?

GINN and AIVC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GINN or AIVC?

AIVC has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to GINN (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

Which ETF is better, GINN or AIVC?

On 5-year performance, AIVC leads with 21.08% vs 7.37% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINN or AIVC?

Over the 5-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 21.08% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or AIVC?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or AIVC?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.09% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between GINN and AIVC?

GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.59% for AIVC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.42 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.