GIMMX vs. JAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX).
GIMMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 29, 2013. JAAAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 1, 2009.
Performance
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 0.28% | 15.44% | -4.85% | 2.78% | -4.72% | 6.14% | 6.45% | 7.60% | -3.51% | -0.19% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 2.52% | 6.18% | 6.59% | 5.85% | -3.12% | 4.77% | 4.36% | 8.95% | -4.09% | 6.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than JAAAX's 2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed JAAAX with an annualized return of 2.80%, while JAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.05% annualized return.
GIMMX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 9.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
JAAAX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIMMX vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
GIMMX
JAAAX
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIMMX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.75 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 2.35 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.88 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 9.41 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIMMX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.75 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.98 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.93 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.84 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIMMX and JAAAX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison
GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than JAAAX's 1.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 8.35% | 8.38% | 5.08% | 3.43% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 0.72% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 1.49% | 1.53% | 1.17% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 1.72% | 0.74% | 3.38% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 0.77% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum JAAAX drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and JAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIMMX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -15.72% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -4.43% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.67% | -6.28% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.67% | -12.64% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -1.61% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -2.06% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 0.88% | +0.45% |
Volatility
GIMMX vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 1.16%. This indicates that GIMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIMMX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 1.16% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 2.74% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 4.73% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 4.22% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 4.38% | +1.07% |