GIMMX vs. VOO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GIMMX (Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - GIMMX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX returned 3.12%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GIMMX charges 1.93%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

GIMMX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.

GIMMX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 3.33%
• YTD: 6.00%
• 1Y: 14.81%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 3.12%
• ALL TIME*: 2.55%

VOO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 8.58%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 15.14%
• ALL TIME*: 14.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.82B	$3.78B	$5.44B

GIMMX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	6.00%	15.44%	-4.85%	2.78%	-4.72%	6.14%	6.45%	7.60%	-3.51%	-0.19%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.16%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMMX and VOO is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.59

Over the past year, GIMMX and VOO have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GIMMX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIMMX

GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 71
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIMMX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIMMX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.53	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.13	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.21	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	9.44	-0.23

GIMMX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMMX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIMMX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIMMX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.67%	-33.99%	+21.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	-8.90%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.74%	-18.69%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.67%	-24.52%	+11.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.67%	-33.99%	+21.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-1.38%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-3.67%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	2.08%	-0.65%

Volatility

GIMMX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) is 1.45%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that GIMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIMMX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	3.54%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.25%	10.10%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.55%	12.82%	-4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.88%	16.93%	-11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.49%	18.01%	-12.52%

GIMMX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIMMX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund	7.90%	8.38%	5.08%	3.43%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	1.83%	0.72%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIMMX and VOO in my portfolio?

GIMMX and VOO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIMMX or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to GIMMX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GIMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.