GIMMX vs. BAMBX
GIMMX (Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund) and BAMBX (BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX returned 3.41%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for BAMBX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIMMX charges 1.93%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for BAMBX.
Performance
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed BAMBX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while BAMBX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.
GIMMX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
BAMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.03%
- 1Y
- 1.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 6.65% | 15.44% | -4.85% | 2.78% | -4.72% | 6.14% | 6.45% | 7.60% | -3.51% | -0.19% |
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 4.59% | 6.61% | 6.19% | -3.23% | 5.84% | 3.34% | 8.25% | 1.51% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIMMX and BAMBX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIMMX vs. BAMBX — Risk / Return Rank
GIMMX
BAMBX
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIMMX | BAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.08 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 0.34 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 0.83 | +12.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, which is greater than BAMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and BAMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIMMX | BAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -8.84% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -5.19% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.74% | -5.19% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.67% | -6.66% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.67% | -8.84% | -3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -4.08% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -1.27% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 2.12% | -0.80% |
Volatility
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) at 1.31%. This indicates that GIMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIMMX | BAMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.31% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 3.42% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 4.27% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.86% | 3.69% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 3.62% | +1.86% |
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMBX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIMMX vs. BAMBX - Dividend Comparison
GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than BAMBX's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 1.97% | 1.97% | 3.86% | 4.13% | 4.70% | 2.39% | 1.09% | 3.73% | 8.70% | 3.81% | 4.82% | 0.00% |
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 7.85% | 8.38% | 5.08% | 3.43% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIMMX and BAMBX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIMMX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BAMBX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs BAMBX's -8.84%.
GIMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIMMX and BAMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer