GIMMX vs. GSPKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX).
GIMMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 29, 2013. GSPKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 31, 2005.
Performance
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | -0.55% | 15.44% | -4.85% | 2.78% | -4.72% | 6.14% | 6.45% | 7.60% | -3.51% | -0.19% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | -6.00% | 13.60% | 29.55% | 21.39% | -15.20% | 22.79% | 14.15% | 25.11% | -6.29% | 15.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than GSPKX's -6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 2.71%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
GIMMX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
GSPKX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -6.00%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIMMX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank
GIMMX
GSPKX
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIMMX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.72 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.15 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 0.73 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 3.78 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIMMX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.72 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.66 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.50 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIMMX and GSPKX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison
GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than GSPKX's 7.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMMX Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund | 8.42% | 8.38% | 5.08% | 3.43% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% | 0.72% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 7.03% | 6.32% | 12.77% | 6.48% | 6.33% | 6.01% | 7.19% | 6.86% | 7.95% | 6.13% | 5.63% | 6.29% |
Drawdowns
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and GSPKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIMMX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -51.90% | +39.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -12.04% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.67% | -22.34% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.67% | -32.70% | +20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -7.83% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -6.04% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 2.44% | -1.13% |
Volatility
GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) is 2.41%, while Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that GIMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIMMX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 3.95% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 7.66% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 16.71% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 15.95% | -10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 16.88% | -11.44% |