PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIMMX vs. GSPKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMMX achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than GSPKX's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GIMMX has underperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 3.12%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


GIMMX

1D
0.53%
1M
0.26%
6M
3.33%
YTD
6.00%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
3.12%
ALL TIME*
2.55%

GSPKX

1D
1.32%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.75%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.64%
ALL TIME*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
6.00%15.44%-4.85%2.78%-4.72%6.14%6.45%7.60%-3.51%-0.19%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.37%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMMX and GSPKX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.58

Over the past year, GIMMX and GSPKX have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIMMX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIMMX
GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIMMXGSPKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.37

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

11.61

-2.40

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GSPKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMMX and GSPKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMMX drawdown since its inception was -12.67%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMMX and GSPKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIMMXGSPKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.67%

-51.90%

+39.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-7.83%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.74%

-20.51%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-22.34%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.67%

-32.70%

+20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.24%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-5.95%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.60%

-0.17%

Volatility

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) is 1.45%, while Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that GIMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIMMXGSPKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

2.76%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.25%

8.46%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

10.54%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

16.07%

-10.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

16.88%

-11.39%

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMMX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIMMX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison

GIMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than GSPKX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.90%8.38%5.08%3.43%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.97%0.00%0.00%1.83%0.72%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
6.00%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIMMX and GSPKX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSPKX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to GIMMX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMMX dropped -12.67% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.

GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIMMX and GSPKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer