PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILT vs. ACMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILT vs. ACMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILT achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly lower than ACMR's 128.66% return.


GILT

1D
3.17%
1M
-20.43%
YTD
23.42%
6M
35.57%
1Y
167.06%
3Y*
44.71%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
14.85%

ACMR

1D
1.51%
1M
70.84%
YTD
128.66%
6M
160.56%
1Y
290.50%
3Y*
110.07%
5Y*
26.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILT vs. ACMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
23.42%110.41%0.65%5.34%-17.96%18.14%-12.01%-9.43%18.35%3.61%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
128.66%161.26%-22.72%153.44%-72.87%4.95%340.38%69.58%107.24%-13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GILT and ACMR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILT:

$1.23B

ACMR:

$6.29B

EPS

GILT:

$0.49

ACMR:

$1.33

PE Ratio

GILT:

32.71

ACMR:

68.01

PS Ratio

GILT:

2.22

ACMR:

6.45

PB Ratio

GILT:

2.30

ACMR:

3.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILT:

$470.09M

ACMR:

$960.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILT:

$142.60M

ACMR:

$424.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

GILT:

$56.44M

ACMR:

$162.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILT vs. ACMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILT
GILT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ACMR
ACMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ACMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILT vs. ACMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILTACMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.48

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

6.32

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

16.21

-3.40

GILT vs. ACMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the ACMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILT and ACMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILTACMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.92

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.33

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.67

-0.81

Drawdowns

GILT vs. ACMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than ACMR's maximum drawdown of -87.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILT and ACMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILTACMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-87.23%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.65%

-46.34%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.94%

-58.42%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.20%

-84.81%

+21.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.43%

-2.86%

-96.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.78%

-39.29%

-41.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

18.02%

-4.93%

Volatility

GILT vs. ACMR - Volatility Comparison

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT) has a higher volatility of 32.18% compared to ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) at 25.48%. This indicates that GILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILTACMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.18%

25.48%

+6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.94%

55.35%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.70%

74.61%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.38%

80.26%

-31.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.48%

83.30%

-35.82%

Dividends

GILT vs. ACMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GILT nor ACMR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.91%5.52%5.71%

Financials

GILT vs. ACMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and ACM Research, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
110.47M
231.26M
(GILT) Total Revenue
(ACMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GILT vs. ACMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd and ACM Research, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
34.1%
46.4%
Portfolio components
GILT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.65M and revenue of 110.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

ACMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

GILT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported an operating income of 5.43M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

ACMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

GILT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd reported a net income of 5.23M and revenue of 110.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

ACMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GILT and ACMR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GILT has higher volatility (32.18%) compared to ACMR (25.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GILT dropped -99.94% vs ACMR's -87.23%.

ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILT and ACMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer