PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACMR vs. GSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACMR vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACMR achieves a 133.00% return, which is significantly higher than GSL's 10.63% return.


ACMR

1D
12.03%
1M
76.26%
YTD
133.00%
6M
179.65%
1Y
304.04%
3Y*
109.76%
5Y*
28.80%
10Y*

GSL

1D
-0.95%
1M
-5.96%
YTD
10.63%
6M
8.10%
1Y
59.96%
3Y*
36.73%
5Y*
27.20%
10Y*
16.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACMR vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
133.00%161.26%-22.72%153.44%-72.87%4.95%340.38%69.58%107.24%-13.22%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
10.63%73.47%18.09%28.97%-22.16%100.35%34.65%78.02%-46.55%-18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ACMR and GSL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.18

The correlation between ACMR and GSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACMR:

$6.41B

GSL:

$1.38B

EPS

ACMR:

$1.33

GSL:

$10.76

PE Ratio

ACMR:

69.30

GSL:

3.49

PEG Ratio

ACMR:

2.42

GSL:

0.13

PS Ratio

ACMR:

6.57

GSL:

1.75

PB Ratio

ACMR:

4.06

GSL:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACMR:

$960.23M

GSL:

$770.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACMR:

$424.76M

GSL:

$409.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACMR:

$162.91M

GSL:

$528.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACMR vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACMR
ACMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ACMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACMR vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACMRGSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.11

2.18

+1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

2.87

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

3.61

+3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.08

11.31

+5.77

ACMR vs. GSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACMR Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACMR and GSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACMRGSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

2.18

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.73

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.01

+0.67

Drawdowns

ACMR vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACMR drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, smaller than the maximum GSL drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACMR and GSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACMRGSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-95.26%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.34%

-17.09%

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.42%

-35.82%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.81%

-47.50%

-37.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-9.78%

+8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-58.81%

+19.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.01%

5.46%

+12.55%

Volatility

ACMR vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) has a higher volatility of 25.11% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) at 10.47%. This indicates that ACMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACMRGSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.11%

10.47%

+14.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.24%

20.68%

+34.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.53%

27.68%

+46.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.32%

37.53%

+42.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.33%

54.84%

+28.49%

Dividends

ACMR vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

ACMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.39%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%

Financials

ACMR vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACM Research, Inc. and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
231.26M
198.08M
(ACMR) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACMR vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACM Research, Inc. and Global Ship Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
46.4%
53.7%
Portfolio components
ACMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

ACMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

ACMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACMR and GSL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACMR has higher volatility (25.11%) compared to GSL (10.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACMR dropped -87.23% vs GSL's -95.26%.

ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACMR and GSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer