ACMR vs. XPO
ACMR (ACM Research, Inc.) and XPO (XPO Logistics, Inc.) are both stocks. ACMR operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while XPO operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ACMR returned 28.80%/yr vs 33.83%/yr for XPO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACMR vs. XPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACMR achieves a 133.00% return, which is significantly higher than XPO's 59.62% return.
ACMR
- 1D
- 12.03%
- 1M
- 76.26%
- YTD
- 133.00%
- 6M
- 179.65%
- 1Y
- 304.04%
- 3Y*
- 109.76%
- 5Y*
- 28.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XPO
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 59.62%
- 6M
- 60.28%
- 1Y
- 92.17%
- 3Y*
- 63.57%
- 5Y*
- 33.83%
- 10Y*
- 36.41%
ACMR vs. XPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 133.00% | 161.26% | -22.72% | 153.44% | -72.87% | 4.95% | 340.38% | 69.58% | 107.24% | -13.22% |
XPO XPO Logistics, Inc. | 59.62% | 3.63% | 49.73% | 163.11% | -27.64% | 11.60% | 49.56% | 39.73% | -37.72% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACMR and XPO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
ACMR:
$6.41B
XPO:
$25.82B
ACMR:
$1.33
XPO:
$2.92
ACMR:
69.30
XPO:
74.34
ACMR:
2.42
XPO:
2.79
ACMR:
6.57
XPO:
3.12
ACMR:
4.06
XPO:
13.95
ACMR:
$960.23M
XPO:
$8.30B
ACMR:
$424.76M
XPO:
$772.00M
ACMR:
$162.91M
XPO:
$1.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACMR vs. XPO — Risk / Return Rank
ACMR
XPO
ACMR vs. XPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACMR | XPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.11 | 2.14 | +1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 2.71 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 5.80 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.08 | 13.83 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACMR | XPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11 | 2.14 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.73 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
ACMR vs. XPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACMR drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than XPO's maximum drawdown of -82.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACMR and XPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACMR | XPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.23% | -82.85% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.34% | -15.63% | -30.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.42% | -42.19% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.81% | -53.17% | -31.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -5.01% | +4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -30.30% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.01% | 6.55% | +11.46% |
Volatility
ACMR vs. XPO - Volatility Comparison
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) has a higher volatility of 25.11% compared to XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) at 13.20%. This indicates that ACMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACMR | XPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.11% | 13.20% | +11.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.24% | 32.45% | +22.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.53% | 43.39% | +31.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.32% | 46.92% | +33.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.33% | 47.81% | +35.52% |
Dividends
ACMR vs. XPO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACMR nor XPO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ACMR vs. XPO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACM Research, Inc. and XPO Logistics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACMR vs. XPO - Profitability Comparison
ACMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
XPO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ACMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
XPO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
ACMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
XPO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACMR and XPO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACMR has higher volatility (25.11%) compared to XPO (13.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACMR dropped -87.23% vs XPO's -82.85%.
ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACMR and XPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer