GILHX vs. SECUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX).
GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013. SECUX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Sep 17, 1969.
Performance
GILHX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GILHX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.01% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 1.72% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILHX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GILHX has underperformed SECUX with an annualized return of 3.12%, while SECUX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
SECUX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GILHX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GILHX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank
GILHX
SECUX
GILHX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILHX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 0.55 | +1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | 0.94 | +3.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.13 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 0.92 | +3.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.90 | 3.61 | +13.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILHX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.55 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.33 | 0.16 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.71 | 0.48 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.25 | +1.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between GILHX and SECUX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GILHX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison
GILHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
Drawdowns
GILHX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILHX drawdown since its inception was -8.10%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILHX and SECUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILHX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -71.68% | +63.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -12.94% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.10% | -37.80% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.10% | -38.56% | +30.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -6.96% | +6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -18.49% | +17.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 3.29% | -3.00% |
Volatility
GILHX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) is 0.54%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that GILHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GILHX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 7.67% | -7.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 12.41% | -11.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 21.02% | -19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 21.42% | -19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 21.12% | -19.29% |