PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIL vs. RDEIY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GIL vs. RDEIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than RDEIY's -4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has outperformed RDEIY with an annualized return of 9.52%, while RDEIY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.


GIL

1D
1.81%
1M
6.91%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
1.32%
1Y
33.46%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
9.52%

RDEIY

1D
0.23%
1M
3.92%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
1.66%
1Y
-10.16%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
3.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. RDEIY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
-1.83%35.08%45.31%23.58%-33.93%54.00%-4.46%-1.17%-4.58%29.00%
RDEIY
Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR
-4.17%14.04%9.95%1.07%-15.41%9.39%8.06%-6.12%2.84%28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and RDEIY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIL:

$11.25B

RDEIY:

$9.48B

EPS

GIL:

$1.54

RDEIY:

€0.43

PE Ratio

GIL:

39.44

RDEIY:

17.66

PS Ratio

GIL:

2.40

RDEIY:

4.35

PB Ratio

GIL:

3.30

RDEIY:

1.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIL:

$4.09B

RDEIY:

€1.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIL:

$1.18B

RDEIY:

€1.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIL:

$631.40M

RDEIY:

€1.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIL vs. RDEIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL
GIL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RDEIY
RDEIY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RDEIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDEIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDEIY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RDEIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDEIY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. RDEIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GILRDEIYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.92

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

-0.51

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

-0.82

+3.56

GIL vs. RDEIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the RDEIY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and RDEIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIL vs. RDEIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than RDEIY's maximum drawdown of -40.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and RDEIY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILRDEIYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-40.85%

-46.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

-22.31%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.28%

-25.03%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-30.75%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

-34.37%

-40.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.52%

-18.91%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-10.83%

-8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.70%

13.83%

-3.13%

Volatility

GIL vs. RDEIY - Volatility Comparison

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a higher volatility of 10.74% compared to Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY) at 4.59%. This indicates that GIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDEIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILRDEIYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.74%

4.59%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

15.13%

+11.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.65%

19.81%

+14.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.13%

21.38%

+10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

22.93%

+11.68%

Dividends

GIL vs. RDEIY - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than RDEIY's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
1.56%1.45%1.74%2.25%2.47%1.53%0.55%1.82%1.48%1.16%1.23%0.91%
RDEIY
Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR
5.35%4.93%6.30%6.54%6.21%4.42%4.50%3.92%3.48%6.36%4.63%2.84%

Financials

GIL vs. RDEIY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.17B
841.34M
(GIL) Total Revenue
(RDEIY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GIL values in USD, RDEIY values in EUR

GIL vs. RDEIY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
23.9%
62.6%
Portfolio components
GIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.35M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

RDEIY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR reported a gross profit of 526.62M and revenue of 841.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

GIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 59.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

RDEIY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR reported an operating income of 354.69M and revenue of 841.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.2%.

GIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of -65.79M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -5.6%.

RDEIY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR reported a net income of 234.36M and revenue of 841.34M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIL and RDEIY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIL has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to RDEIY (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs RDEIY's -40.85%.

GIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIL and RDEIY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer