RDEIY vs. LQD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RDEIY (Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR) is a stock, while LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Over the past 10 years, RDEIY returned 2.36%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for LQD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RDEIY vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDEIY achieves a -6.80% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RDEIY has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.36%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.

RDEIY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: -6.80%
• 6M: -2.14%
• 1Y: -12.41%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: 2.36%

LQD

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: 2.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDEIY vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RDEIY Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR	-6.80%	14.04%	9.95%	1.07%	-15.41%	9.39%	8.06%	-6.12%	2.84%	28.56%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.46%	7.90%	0.86%	9.40%	-17.92%	-1.84%	10.97%	17.37%	-3.79%	7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RDEIY and LQD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2008	0.16

The correlation between RDEIY and LQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RDEIY vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDEIY

RDEIY Risk / Return Rank: 18
RDEIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RDEIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RDEIY Omega Ratio Rank: 16
RDEIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RDEIY Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LQD

LQD Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDEIY vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDEIY	LQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.14	-1.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.76	1.67	-2.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.20	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	1.83	-2.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	5.23	-6.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDEIY vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDEIY Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDEIY and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDEIY	LQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.14	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.01	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.29	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.54	-0.25

Drawdowns

RDEIY vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDEIY drawdown since its inception was -40.85%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDEIY and LQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDEIY	LQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.85%	-24.95%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.31%	-3.34%	-18.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.03%	-8.43%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.75%	-24.95%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.37%	-24.95%	-9.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.13%	-3.72%	-17.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-3.99%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.52%	1.17%	+12.35%

Volatility

RDEIY vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR (RDEIY) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.65%. This indicates that RDEIY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDEIY	LQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	1.65%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	3.90%	+11.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.90%	5.36%	+14.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.38%	8.65%	+12.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.96%	8.68%	+14.28%

Dividends

RDEIY vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

RDEIY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than LQD's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.57%	4.48%	4.45%	3.99%	3.30%	2.30%	2.66%	3.29%	3.67%	3.10%	3.34%	3.47%
RDEIY Red Electrica Corporacion SA ADR	5.51%	4.93%	6.30%	6.54%	6.21%	4.42%	4.50%	3.92%	3.48%	6.36%	4.63%	2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDEIY and LQD in my portfolio?

RDEIY and LQD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDEIY or LQD?

RDEIY has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to LQD (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDEIY dropped -40.85% vs LQD's -24.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.