GII vs. PWRD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. GII is passively managed, while PWRD is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.

Performance

GII vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 19.90% return.

GII

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 15.99%
• 3Y*: 16.21%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

PWRD

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 19.90%
• 6M: 17.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	8.32%	6.33%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	19.90%	7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and PWRD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

GII vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII

GII Risk / Return Rank: 47
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GII	PWRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GII	PWRD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.32	-1.03

Drawdowns

GII vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and PWRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GII	PWRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-14.12%	-36.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-0.67%	-3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.52%	-3.15%	-8.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GII	PWRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	23.98%	-13.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	23.98%	-9.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	23.98%	-6.84%

GII vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GII vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	2.70%	3.17%	3.23%	3.70%	3.07%	2.37%	2.66%	3.39%	3.31%	3.38%	3.11%	3.54%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GII and PWRD in my portfolio?

GII and PWRD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GII or PWRD?

On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GII or PWRD?

GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GII or PWRD?

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between GII and PWRD?

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.75% for PWRD.