GII vs. POWR
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR).
GII and POWR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GII is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure. It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. POWR is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
GII vs. POWR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GII vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.96% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 11.79% | 10.81% | -1.30% | 3.66% | 42.54% | 42.03% | -28.30% | 8.44% | -11.74% | 9.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than POWR's 11.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GII having a 8.95% annualized return and POWR not far behind at 8.84%.
GII
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
POWR
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 13.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GII vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GII and POWR have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Return for Risk
GII vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank
GII
POWR
GII vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.63 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 0.94 | +1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.14 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 0.82 | +2.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.68 | 2.88 | +12.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.63 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.69 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.35 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.17 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and POWR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GII vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than POWR's 7.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.91% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 7.07% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Drawdowns
GII vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and POWR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -65.98% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -17.67% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -25.09% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -63.42% | +20.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -2.03% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.60% | -18.36% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 5.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility
GII vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 4.56%, while iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GII | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 5.93% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 11.98% | -4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 21.77% | -8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 23.23% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 25.64% | -8.49% |