PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIEYX vs. GGBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIEYX achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than GGBZX's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GIEYX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.


GIEYX

1D
-2.20%
1M
0.78%
YTD
6.24%
6M
5.77%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
9.80%

GGBZX

1D
-2.03%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
8.42%
6M
7.49%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIEYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund
6.24%28.09%6.71%18.38%-16.02%9.60%7.78%23.50%-15.08%29.81%
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
8.42%19.62%15.45%20.67%-19.61%14.95%15.47%26.93%-10.15%25.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GIEYX and GGBZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.85

The correlation between GIEYX and GGBZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIEYX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIEYX
GIEYX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GIEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GIEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GGBZX
GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIEYXGGBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.14

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

9.11

-3.75

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the GGBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIEYX and GGBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIEYX drawdown since its inception was -64.13%, which is greater than GGBZX's maximum drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIEYX and GGBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIEYXGGBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.13%

-57.68%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-10.02%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-16.21%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-28.31%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-33.03%

-3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.55%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.32%

-9.22%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.35%

+0.74%

Volatility

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund (GIEYX) is 5.27%, while GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that GIEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIEYXGGBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.60%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

11.11%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

13.46%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.61%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.42%

-0.08%

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIEYX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIEYX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison

GIEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, less than GGBZX's 10.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.67%11.57%3.37%3.51%13.16%7.72%6.01%12.14%3.94%7.18%9.55%27.06%
GIEYX
GuideStone Funds International Equity Fund
9.76%10.37%8.78%3.98%1.98%8.37%1.02%5.15%14.06%8.55%2.87%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GIEYX and GGBZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGBZX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to GIEYX (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIEYX dropped -64.13% vs GGBZX's -57.68%.

GGBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIEYX and GGBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer