PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIDGX vs. LVAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GIDGX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.16% annualized return.


GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
10.87%

LVAFX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.53%
YTD
13.49%
6M
14.99%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.66%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.49%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GIDGX and LVAFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.81

The correlation between GIDGX and LVAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIDGX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIDGXLVAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.58

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

4.59

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.38

17.62

-0.24

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the LVAFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIDGX and LVAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIDGXLVAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

3.11

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.64

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.60

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum LVAFX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and LVAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIDGXLVAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-33.69%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-5.76%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-17.52%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-18.34%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.63%

-33.69%

+2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-4.75%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

1.50%

-0.02%

Volatility

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.03%. This indicates that GIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIDGXLVAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.03%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

6.12%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

8.49%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

13.23%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

13.59%

+0.57%

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIDGX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison

GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than LVAFX's 8.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.53%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.96%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIDGX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIDGX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to LVAFX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDGX dropped -31.63% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIDGX and LVAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer