GIDGX vs. GMGEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GIDGX (Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio) and GMGEX (GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GIDGX returned 11.22%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for GMGEX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GIDGX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for GMGEX.

Performance

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than GMGEX's 18.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GIDGX having a 11.22% annualized return and GMGEX not far ahead at 11.70%.

GIDGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 24.70%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

GMGEX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 18.76%
• 6M: 18.21%
• 1Y: 40.11%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio	11.86%	15.74%	20.59%	17.92%	-12.75%	18.46%	8.41%	19.97%	-8.26%	15.18%
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	18.76%	29.14%	4.12%	22.27%	-17.07%	14.99%	9.55%	25.45%	-13.04%	26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GIDGX and GMGEX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.92

The correlation between GIDGX and GMGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GIDGX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIDGX

GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 84
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GMGEX

GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 91
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIDGX	GMGEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	3.12	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	4.22	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.57	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	4.46	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.04	17.42	-0.38

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the GMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIDGX and GMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum GMGEX drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and GMGEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIDGX	GMGEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-58.47%	+26.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-9.24%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.69%	-17.12%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-28.58%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.63%	-34.98%	+3.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.91%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-16.72%	+12.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	2.36%	-0.85%

Volatility

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) is 3.72%, while GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that GIDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIDGX	GMGEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	4.75%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	10.65%	-2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	13.23%	-3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	14.89%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	16.08%	-1.90%

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GIDGX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison

GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than GMGEX's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio	5.52%	5.92%	12.06%	4.32%	8.89%	8.41%	1.99%	4.85%	5.67%	3.35%	2.97%	3.21%
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund	3.95%	4.69%	0.29%	5.62%	7.81%	7.76%	3.83%	3.14%	3.14%	2.90%	3.71%	4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIDGX and GMGEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GIDGX and GMGEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GIDGX or GMGEX?

GMGEX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to GIDGX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDGX dropped -31.63% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.