GIDGX vs. GCCHX
GIDGX (Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio) and GCCHX (GMO Climate Change Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GIDGX returned 11.14%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for GCCHX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIDGX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GCCHX.
Performance
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 20.11% return.
GIDGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
GCCHX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 68.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.52%
- 10Y*
- —
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 11.86% | 15.74% | 20.59% | 17.92% | -12.75% | 18.46% | 8.41% | 19.97% | -8.26% | 10.79% |
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund | 20.11% | 39.25% | -25.63% | -6.85% | -10.39% | 21.84% | 42.82% | 27.36% | -16.35% | 26.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIDGX and GCCHX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GIDGX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIDGX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank
GIDGX
GCCHX
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIDGX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.45 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 5.81 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.04 | 17.68 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and GCCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIDGX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -54.32% | +22.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -11.76% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.69% | -52.03% | +37.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -54.32% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.77% | +6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -13.86% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 3.86% | -2.35% |
Volatility
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) is 3.72%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that GIDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIDGX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 8.79% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 17.71% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 23.85% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 27.15% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 25.20% | -11.02% |
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIDGX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison
GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than GCCHX's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund | 1.25% | 1.51% | 0.66% | 0.96% | 2.24% | 25.43% | 5.42% | 4.03% | 2.62% | 3.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 5.52% | 5.92% | 12.06% | 4.32% | 8.89% | 8.41% | 1.99% | 4.85% | 5.67% | 3.35% | 2.97% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIDGX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCCHX has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to GIDGX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDGX dropped -31.63% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.
GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIDGX and GCCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer