GIC vs. FUN
GIC (Global Industrial Company) and FUN (Cedar Fair, L.P.) are both stocks. GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while FUN operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GIC returned 22.34%/yr vs -6.05%/yr for FUN. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIC vs. FUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIC achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than FUN's 48.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GIC has outperformed FUN with an annualized return of 22.34%, while FUN has yielded a comparatively lower -6.05% annualized return.
GIC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
FUN
- 1D
- -8.94%
- 1M
- 14.52%
- YTD
- 48.04%
- 6M
- 64.80%
- 1Y
- -25.17%
- 3Y*
- -15.57%
- 5Y*
- -11.86%
- 10Y*
- -6.05%
GIC vs. FUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 14.35% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 48.04% | -68.17% | 26.39% | -0.96% | -16.23% | 27.25% | -27.49% | 25.65% | -22.66% | 6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIC and FUN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1995 | 0.19 |
The correlation between GIC and FUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIC:
$1.26B
FUN:
$2.30B
GIC:
$1.96
FUN:
-$16.06
GIC:
0.89
FUN:
0.79
GIC:
2.16
FUN:
0.26
GIC:
$1.41B
FUN:
$2.90B
GIC:
$500.00M
FUN:
$1.59B
GIC:
$106.30M
FUN:
-$733.45M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIC vs. FUN — Risk / Return Rank
GIC
FUN
GIC vs. FUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Industrial Company (GIC) and Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIC | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.98 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.41 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | -0.63 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIC vs. FUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIC drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than FUN's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIC and FUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIC | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -77.75% | -20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -61.05% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -77.74% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -77.74% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.74% | -77.75% | +22.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.73% | -60.59% | +36.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.88% | -19.88% | -39.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 39.96% | -23.82% |
Volatility
GIC vs. FUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Industrial Company (GIC) is 4.94%, while Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a volatility of 16.10%. This indicates that GIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIC | FUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 16.10% | -11.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 46.12% | -25.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.42% | 67.39% | -25.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 44.19% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.39% | 45.29% | +1.10% |
Dividends
GIC vs. FUN - Dividend Comparison
GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUN Cedar Fair, L.P. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 3.02% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 6.69% | 7.60% | 5.32% | 5.19% | 5.51% |
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.29% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIC vs. FUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Industrial Company and Cedar Fair, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GIC and FUN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUN has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to GIC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIC dropped -98.09% vs FUN's -77.75%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIC and FUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer