PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIAX vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIAX vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIAX achieves a 22.12% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -1.50% return.


GIAX

1D
-2.89%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.12%
6M
19.89%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIAX vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIAX and MAGY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.72

The correlation between GIAX and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

GIAX vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GIAX
MAGY

Technology

36.5%

-

Communication Services

14.8%

-

Financial Services

14.0%
99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Industrials

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Utilities

4.0%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Energy

1.3%

-

Technology

GIAX
36.5%
MAGY

-

Communication Services

GIAX
14.8%
MAGY

-

Financial Services

GIAX
14.0%
MAGY
99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GIAX
11.8%
MAGY

-

Industrials

GIAX
5.8%
MAGY

-

Basic Materials

GIAX
4.4%
MAGY

-

Utilities

GIAX
4.0%
MAGY

-

Healthcare

GIAX
3.1%
MAGY

-

Real Estate

GIAX
2.9%
MAGY

-

Consumer Defensive

GIAX
1.4%
MAGY

-

Energy

GIAX
1.3%
MAGY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIAX vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIAX vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIAXMAGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

0.94

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

3.11

+4.73

GIAX vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the MAGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIAX and MAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIAXMAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

0.93

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.53

-0.56

Drawdowns

GIAX vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIAX and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIAXMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.38%

-14.29%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-14.29%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-3.64%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-2.69%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

4.29%

-0.22%

Volatility

GIAX vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) at 3.67%. This indicates that GIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIAXMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

3.67%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

11.29%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

14.38%

+7.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

14.57%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

14.57%

+6.89%

GIAX vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIAX vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

GIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.33%, less than MAGY's 37.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.33%25.62%10.58%
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
37.35%23.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIAX and MAGY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIAX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIAX dropped -20.38% vs MAGY's -14.29%.

On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 31.82% vs 13.34% for MAGY. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 31.82% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 22.33% for GIAX.

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for GIAX and 0.99% for MAGY.

GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIAX and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer