PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHY vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GHY has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.32%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


GHY

1D
0.33%
1M
1.21%
YTD
0.83%
6M
2.24%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.32%

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHY vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHY
PGIM Global High Yield Fund
0.83%10.46%20.25%17.29%-20.04%12.73%6.33%26.51%-3.54%4.38%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GHY and SCHG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2012

0.43

The correlation between GHY and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHY vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHY
GHY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

1.76

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.20

2.37

-2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.31

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

1.70

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.08

5.70

-5.61

GHY vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHY Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHY and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

1.76

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.73

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.88

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.85

-0.46

Drawdowns

GHY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.35%

-34.59%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-16.41%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-23.39%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.50%

-34.59%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.35%

-34.59%

-6.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-0.57%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-5.20%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

4.90%

-0.20%

Volatility

GHY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) is 3.10%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that GHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.31%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

11.56%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

15.45%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

22.27%

-8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

21.55%

-6.22%

GHY vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GHY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHY
PGIM Global High Yield Fund
10.48%10.21%10.23%11.09%11.62%8.35%8.67%8.04%7.72%7.77%8.53%10.07%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHY and SCHG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to GHY (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHY dropped -41.35% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHY and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer