GHY vs. RSF
GHY (PGIM Global High Yield Fund) and RSF (RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GHY returned 4.74%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for RSF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHY charges 0.03%/yr vs 6.38%/yr for RSF.
Performance
GHY vs. RSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than RSF's 7.24% return.
GHY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- -0.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
RSF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GHY vs. RSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | -0.21% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -20.04% | 12.73% | 6.33% | 26.51% | -3.54% | 4.38% |
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 7.24% | 4.62% | 9.26% | 9.03% | -1.62% | 27.59% | 3.10% | -12.10% | -1.41% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHY and RSF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHY vs. RSF — Risk / Return Rank
GHY
RSF
GHY vs. RSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHY | RSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.89 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 8.89 | -9.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHY vs. RSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, which is greater than RSF's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and RSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHY | RSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -30.61% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -3.92% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -6.15% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -10.02% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -0.66% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -4.56% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 1.27% | +3.61% |
Volatility
GHY vs. RSF - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund (RSF) at 1.07%. This indicates that GHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHY | RSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 1.07% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 6.99% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 8.17% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 10.52% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 11.22% | +4.12% |
GHY vs. RSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSF's 6.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHY vs. RSF - Dividend Comparison
GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, less than RSF's 11.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.69% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
RSF RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | 11.25% | 11.30% | 10.87% | 10.85% | 11.78% | 9.52% | 11.76% | 6.92% | 8.21% | 9.22% | 1.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHY and RSF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHY has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to RSF (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHY dropped -41.35% vs RSF's -30.61%.
RSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHY and RSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer