PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHM vs. ALLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GHM vs. ALLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Graham Corporation (GHM) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 67.48% return, which is significantly higher than ALLT's -24.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has outperformed ALLT with an annualized return of 20.89%, while ALLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.99% annualized return.


GHM

1D
3.54%
1M
9.45%
YTD
67.48%
6M
67.74%
1Y
132.68%
3Y*
101.08%
5Y*
50.20%
10Y*
20.89%

ALLT

1D
0.14%
1M
3.51%
YTD
-24.92%
6M
-18.09%
1Y
-9.34%
3Y*
34.25%
5Y*
-17.72%
10Y*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHM vs. ALLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHM
Graham Corporation
67.48%44.43%134.42%97.19%-22.67%-15.50%-28.39%-2.28%10.81%-3.80%
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
-24.92%65.21%260.61%-52.03%-71.04%12.93%23.76%40.03%13.88%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GHM and ALLT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GHM:

$1.20B

ALLT:

$368.21M

EPS

GHM:

$1.12

ALLT:

$0.13

PE Ratio

GHM:

95.66

ALLT:

56.51

PEG Ratio

GHM:

0.32

ALLT:

0.11

PS Ratio

GHM:

4.87

ALLT:

3.21

PB Ratio

GHM:

8.54

ALLT:

3.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

GHM:

$245.29M

ALLT:

$105.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GHM:

$57.75M

ALLT:

$74.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

GHM:

$14.76M

ALLT:

$10.81M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHM vs. ALLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHM
GHM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLT
ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHM vs. ALLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHMALLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.04

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.33

-0.21

+7.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.79

-0.38

+18.17

GHM vs. ALLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the ALLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHM and ALLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHM vs. ALLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, smaller than the maximum ALLT drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and ALLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHMALLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.11%

-95.42%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-45.65%

+27.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.46%

-60.09%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.83%

-93.64%

+40.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.83%

-93.72%

+18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-73.67%

+73.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.37%

-65.05%

+17.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

24.93%

-17.44%

Volatility

GHM vs. ALLT - Volatility Comparison

Graham Corporation (GHM) has a higher volatility of 19.86% compared to Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) at 16.05%. This indicates that GHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHMALLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.86%

16.05%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.35%

52.77%

-13.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.49%

65.72%

-13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.41%

60.70%

-11.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.24%

52.32%

-7.08%

Dividends

GHM vs. ALLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GHM nor ALLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GHM
Graham Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.54%2.90%1.92%1.66%1.72%1.63%1.90%

Financials

GHM vs. ALLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Corporation and Allot Communications Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M20222023202420252026
67.08M
26.43M
(GHM) Total Revenue
(ALLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GHM vs. ALLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Graham Corporation and Allot Communications Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
23.4%
70.9%
Portfolio components
GHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.69M and revenue of 67.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

ALLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 18.74M and revenue of 26.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

GHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.

ALLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 1.53M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

GHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.

ALLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 1.94M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GHM and ALLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHM has higher volatility (19.86%) compared to ALLT (16.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs ALLT's -95.42%.

GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHM and ALLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer