GGUS vs. GBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL).
GGUS and GBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. Both GGUS and GBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GGUS vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGUS vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | -8.04% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 0.82% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 0.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a -8.04% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 0.82% return.
GGUS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -7.97%
- 1Y
- 18.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGUS vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GGUS and GBIL have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GGUS vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GGUS
GBIL
GGUS vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 16.02 | -15.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 81.70 | -80.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 24.00 | -22.81 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 200.44 | -199.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 1,299.94 | -1,295.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 16.02 | -15.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 4.79 | -3.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGUS and GBIL is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGUS vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than GBIL's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.86% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
GGUS vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and GBIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -0.76% | -21.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -0.02% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | 0.00% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -0.04% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 0.00% | +4.35% |
Volatility
GGUS vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that GGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 0.08% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 0.15% | +11.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 0.25% | +21.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 0.58% | +18.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 0.47% | +18.81% |