GGUS vs. DGRO
GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GGUS tracks the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GGUS returned 23.97% vs 22.54% for DGRO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
GGUS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
GGUS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
GGUS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 7.56% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGUS and DGRO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between GGUS and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
GGUS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGUS
DGRO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
GGUS
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
GGUS
DGRO
Communication Services
GGUS
DGRO
Healthcare
GGUS
DGRO
Industrials
GGUS
DGRO
Financial Services
GGUS
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
GGUS
DGRO
Real Estate
GGUS
DGRO
-
Energy
GGUS
DGRO
Basic Materials
GGUS
DGRO
Utilities
GGUS
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGUS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
GGUS
DGRO
GGUS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGUS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.50 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 13.52 | -7.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGUS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.39 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.76 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
GGUS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGUS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -35.10% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -6.47% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.28% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -3.44% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 1.67% | +2.66% |
Volatility
GGUS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that GGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGUS | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 2.21% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 6.91% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 9.48% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 13.82% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 16.62% | +2.34% |
GGUS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GGUS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.41% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGUS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGUS has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGUS dropped -22.59% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, GGUS leads with 23.97% vs 22.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GGUS has performed better with a 23.97% return vs 22.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GGUS.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.41% for GGUS.
GGUS tracks Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GGUS and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGUS and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer