PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGEYX vs. GCOZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGEYX achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than GCOZX's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GGEYX has outperformed GCOZX with an annualized return of 14.91%, while GCOZX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.


GGEYX

1D
0.56%
1M
6.27%
YTD
6.00%
6M
4.94%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
14.91%

GCOZX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.84%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.63%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGEYX
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund
6.00%13.18%30.51%42.26%-37.71%17.77%35.74%34.83%0.77%32.56%
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.88%16.13%12.05%16.57%-18.06%11.60%12.96%22.39%-7.50%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GGEYX and GCOZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.90

The correlation between GGEYX and GCOZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGEYX vs. GCOZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGEYX
GGEYX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GGEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GGEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOZX
GCOZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GCOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGEYXGCOZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.11

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.99

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.60

-1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.28

11.49

-8.20

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the GCOZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGEYX and GCOZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGEYXGCOZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.11

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.72

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Drawdowns

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGEYX drawdown since its inception was -54.51%, which is greater than GCOZX's maximum drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGEYX and GCOZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGEYXGCOZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.51%

-47.79%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-8.07%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-12.39%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.59%

-25.19%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-27.50%

-22.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-6.52%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

1.83%

+4.50%

Volatility

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) at 3.05%. This indicates that GGEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGEYXGCOZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.05%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

8.04%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

10.00%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

12.01%

+12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

12.71%

+9.58%

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGEYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOZX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGEYX vs. GCOZX - Dividend Comparison

GGEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than GCOZX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
8.81%9.59%3.47%3.37%9.49%6.85%4.94%9.42%4.24%4.71%5.71%19.06%
GGEYX
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund
13.10%13.89%13.54%4.93%6.41%20.36%15.42%10.02%19.42%10.82%4.49%22.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGEYX and GCOZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGEYX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to GCOZX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGEYX dropped -54.51% vs GCOZX's -47.79%.

GCOZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGEYX and GCOZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer