PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGEYX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGEYX achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GGEYX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.


GGEYX

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.49%
YTD
4.42%
6M
3.11%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
14.74%

JLGMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.22%
YTD
7.21%
6M
5.36%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGEYX
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund
4.42%13.18%30.51%42.26%-37.71%17.77%35.74%34.83%0.77%32.56%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
7.21%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GGEYX and JLGMX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.96

The correlation between GGEYX and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGEYX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGEYX
GGEYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GGEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GGEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGEYXJLGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.26

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

3.60

-0.78

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGEYX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGEYXJLGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.68

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.93

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.85

-0.42

Drawdowns

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGEYX drawdown since its inception was -54.51%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGEYX and JLGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGEYXJLGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.51%

-31.82%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-16.73%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-21.47%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.59%

-31.13%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-31.82%

-17.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.70%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-5.81%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

5.85%

+0.48%

Volatility

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) is 3.61%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that GGEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGEYXJLGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.97%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

11.23%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

15.60%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

20.18%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

21.57%

+0.72%

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGEYX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGEYX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

GGEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than JLGMX's 10.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGEYX
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund
13.30%13.89%13.54%4.93%6.41%20.36%15.42%10.02%19.42%10.82%4.49%22.22%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
10.30%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GGEYX and JLGMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLGMX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to GGEYX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGEYX dropped -54.51% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

JLGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGEYX and JLGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer