GGBZX vs. UCEQX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGBZX (GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund) and UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX returned 11.48%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for UCEQX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GGBZX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for UCEQX.

Performance

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 13.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GGBZX having a 11.48% annualized return and UCEQX not far ahead at 11.59%.

GGBZX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

UCEQX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 30.58%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.38%	19.62%	15.45%	20.67%	-19.61%	14.95%	15.47%	26.93%	-10.15%	25.53%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	13.72%	23.71%	14.50%	19.36%	-16.25%	19.68%	10.76%	22.49%	-12.06%	22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GGBZX and UCEQX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012	0.97

The correlation between GGBZX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGBZX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGBZX

GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

UCEQX

UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGBZX	UCEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.52	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.48	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.45	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.63	15.48	-4.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGBZX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGBZX	UCEQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	2.52	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.72	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.70	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.69	-0.29

Drawdowns

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and UCEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGBZX	UCEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.68%	-35.33%	-22.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-8.96%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.21%	-15.64%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.31%	-25.24%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.03%	-35.33%	+2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-0.68%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.23%	-4.87%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.99%	+0.31%

Volatility

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGBZX	UCEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	3.72%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	9.72%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	12.27%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	15.27%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.46%	16.50%	-0.04%

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGBZX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than UCEQX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.48%	11.57%	3.37%	3.51%	13.16%	7.72%	6.01%	12.14%	3.94%	7.18%	9.55%	27.06%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	4.46%	5.08%	2.56%	5.10%	6.80%	4.61%	8.25%	4.79%	6.73%	1.91%	3.16%	3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGBZX and UCEQX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, GGBZX and UCEQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGBZX or UCEQX?

UCEQX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to GGBZX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGBZX dropped -57.68% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.