GGBZX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGBZX (GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GGBZX returned 18.72%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGBZX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.

Performance

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 7.65% return.

GGBZX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

GQFPX

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 15.46%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.38%	19.62%	15.45%	20.67%	-19.61%	2.49%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	7.65%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GGBZX and GQFPX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between GGBZX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GGBZX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGBZX

GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 35
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGBZX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.54	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.18	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	2.79	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.63	7.90	+2.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGBZX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGBZX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	1.54	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.80	-0.39

Drawdowns

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGBZX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.68%	-16.95%	-40.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-5.24%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.21%	-10.57%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-4.95%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.23%	-3.01%	-6.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	1.85%	+0.45%

Volatility

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.32%. This indicates that GGBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGBZX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	3.32%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	7.71%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	9.52%	+3.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	12.83%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.46%	12.83%	+3.63%

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGBZX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than GQFPX's 5.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.48%	11.57%	3.37%	3.51%	13.16%	7.72%	6.01%	12.14%	3.94%	7.18%	9.55%	27.06%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	5.93%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGBZX and GQFPX in my portfolio?

GGBZX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGBZX or GQFPX?

GGBZX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GQFPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGBZX dropped -57.68% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGBZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.