GGBZX vs. GMTZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GGBZX (GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund) and GMTZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund) are both mutual funds - GGBZX is a Global Equities fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GMTZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX returned 12.03%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for GMTZX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGBZX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for GMTZX.

Performance

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than GMTZX's 4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has outperformed GMTZX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while GMTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.05% annualized return.

GGBZX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

GMTZX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 9.80%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 6.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.68%	19.62%	15.45%	20.67%	-19.61%	14.95%	15.47%	26.93%	-10.15%	25.53%
GMTZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund	4.78%	11.55%	7.50%	10.86%	-13.11%	6.74%	9.16%	15.10%	-3.68%	11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GGBZX and GMTZX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007	0.94

The correlation between GGBZX and GMTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGBZX vs. GMTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGBZX

GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 48
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GMTZX

GMTZX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GMTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GMTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GMTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GMTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GMTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGBZX	GMTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.11	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.08	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.60	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	11.68	-1.08

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the GMTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGBZX and GMTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GMTZX's maximum drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GMTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGBZX	GMTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.68%	-43.84%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.02%	-4.95%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.21%	-6.32%	-9.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.31%	-17.76%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.03%	-17.83%	-15.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.28%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-4.89%	-4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.10%	+1.25%

Volatility

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) at 2.50%. This indicates that GGBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGBZX	GMTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	2.50%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	5.14%	+5.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.31%	6.11%	+7.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	7.28%	+8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	7.33%	+9.17%

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GMTZX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGBZX vs. GMTZX - Dividend Comparison

GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, more than GMTZX's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.46%	11.57%	3.37%	3.51%	13.16%	7.72%	6.01%	12.14%	3.94%	7.18%	9.55%	27.06%
GMTZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund	5.40%	5.66%	6.34%	3.77%	7.27%	5.35%	3.64%	4.01%	6.38%	2.62%	1.45%	15.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGBZX and GMTZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GGBZX and GMTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGBZX or GMTZX?

GGBZX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to GMTZX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGBZX dropped -57.68% vs GMTZX's -43.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.