GGBZX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -6.10% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
GGBZX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -4.22%
- 1Y
- 12.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBZX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBZX
CSUAX
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBZX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 2.17 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.36 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 10.32 | -6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBZX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.63 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.61 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBZX and CSUAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.32%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 12.32% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBZX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -52.20% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -7.98% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -20.45% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -35.05% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -4.38% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -8.49% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.83% | +0.82% |
Volatility
GGBZX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that GGBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBZX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.26% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 6.89% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 11.48% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 12.89% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 14.89% | +1.50% |