CSUAX vs. PORTX
CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX returned 7.26%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for PORTX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSUAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for PORTX.
Performance
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than PORTX's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed PORTX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while PORTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 12.49%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 19.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
PORTX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 12.30% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 8.20% | 1.15% | 7.67% | 19.02% | -24.04% | 22.16% | 24.56% | 28.20% | -7.24% | 27.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and PORTX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSUAX and PORTX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. PORTX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
PORTX
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | -0.05 | +3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | -0.12 | +10.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, roughly equal to the maximum PORTX drawdown of -51.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and PORTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -51.71% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -20.78% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -24.56% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -31.32% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -31.34% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -6.92% | +6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -11.71% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 8.55% | -6.66% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.46%, while Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PORTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | PORTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 4.18% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 18.56% | -10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 20.66% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 19.25% | -6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 18.09% | -3.22% |
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than PORTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. PORTX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, while PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.61% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.61% | 5.84% | 3.55% | 2.61% | 1.85% | 2.32% | 4.50% | 2.46% | 4.66% | 5.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUAX and PORTX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PORTX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to CSUAX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs PORTX's -51.71%.
CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUAX and PORTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer