GFS vs. QRVO
GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and QRVO (Qorvo, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, GFS returned 9.16%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for QRVO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GFS vs. QRVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 121.39% return, which is significantly higher than QRVO's 18.20% return.
GFS
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 121.39%
- 6M
- 93.66%
- 1Y
- 104.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRVO
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.52%
- 5Y*
- -11.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
GFS vs. QRVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 121.39% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 40.02% |
QRVO Qorvo, Inc. | 18.20% | 20.85% | -37.90% | 24.24% | -42.04% | -7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and QRVO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GFS and QRVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFS:
$43.37B
QRVO:
$9.25B
GFS:
$1.39
QRVO:
$3.63
GFS:
55.60
QRVO:
27.55
GFS:
6.32
QRVO:
2.54
GFS:
3.71
QRVO:
2.77
GFS:
$6.84B
QRVO:
$3.68B
GFS:
$1.81B
QRVO:
$1.69B
GFS:
$2.16B
QRVO:
$659.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFS vs. QRVO — Risk / Return Rank
GFS
QRVO
GFS vs. QRVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFS | QRVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 1.24 | +3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 2.44 | +6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFS | QRVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 0.79 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
GFS vs. QRVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum QRVO drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and QRVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFS | QRVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.53% | -74.54% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.10% | -21.97% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.40% | -60.68% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.06% | -49.94% | +35.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -31.88% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 11.14% | +1.27% |
Volatility
GFS vs. QRVO - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 26.13% compared to Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) at 15.19%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFS | QRVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.13% | 15.19% | +10.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.75% | 26.14% | +18.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.66% | 34.65% | +19.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 42.15% | +9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 42.05% | +9.10% |
Dividends
GFS vs. QRVO - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFS nor QRVO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GFS vs. QRVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Qorvo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFS vs. QRVO - Profitability Comparison
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
QRVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.02M and revenue of 808.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
QRVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.51M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
QRVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a net income of 29.73M and revenue of 808.28M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFS and QRVO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFS has higher volatility (26.13%) compared to QRVO (15.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs QRVO's -74.54%.
GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFS and QRVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer