QRVO vs. CDNS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).

Performance

QRVO vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QRVO vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QRVO Qorvo, Inc.	-8.80%	20.85%	-37.90%	24.24%	-42.04%	-5.94%	43.05%	91.39%	-8.81%	26.30%
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc.	-10.36%	4.03%	10.31%	69.55%	-13.80%	36.59%	96.70%	59.52%	3.97%	65.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QRVO : $7.23B CDNS : $76.47B
EPS QRVO : $3.63 CDNS : $4.06
PE Ratio QRVO : 21.22 CDNS : 69.06
PEG Ratio QRVO : 2.13 CDNS : 5.27
PS Ratio QRVO : 1.93 CDNS : 14.46
PB Ratio QRVO : 1.95 CDNS : 10.76
Total Revenue (TTM) QRVO : $3.74B CDNS : $5.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) QRVO : $1.66B CDNS : $5.09B
EBITDA (TTM) QRVO : $292.63M CDNS : $1.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRVO achieves a -8.80% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVO has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 4.25%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 28.05% annualized return.

QRVO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -5.92%
• YTD: -8.80%
• 6M: -14.81%
• 1Y: 6.70%
• 3Y*: -8.79%
• 5Y*: -16.76%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

CDNS

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: -10.36%
• 6M: -20.39%
• 1Y: 8.27%
• 3Y*: 10.07%
• 5Y*: 14.64%
• 10Y*: 28.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QRVO vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRVO

QRVO Risk / Return Rank: 45
QRVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QRVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
QRVO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QRVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QRVO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CDNS

CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 47
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRVO vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRVO	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	0.21	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	0.60	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.08	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	0.36	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	0.80	-0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRVO vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRVO Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRVO and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRVO	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	0.21	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	0.42	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.84	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.22	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between QRVO and CDNS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QRVO vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither QRVO nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QRVO vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRVO drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVO and CDNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRVO	CDNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.54%	-93.13%	+18.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.05%	-28.09%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.54%	-29.59%	-44.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.54%	-32.12%	-42.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-24.96%	-36.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.52%	-39.79%	+8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.40%	12.71%	-1.31%

Volatility

QRVO vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) is 6.46%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that QRVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRVO	CDNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	7.54%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.67%	25.41%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.92%	39.60%	+7.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.59%	35.24%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.75%	33.42%	+8.33%

Financials