PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRVO vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QRVO vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRVO achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVO has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 3.96%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 30.38% annualized return.


QRVO

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.43%
6M
15.95%
YTD
7.17%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-6.33%
5Y*
-13.74%
10Y*
3.96%
ALL TIME*
2.38%

CDNS

1D
2.16%
1M
-8.88%
6M
14.73%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
-4.75%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
18.16%
10Y*
30.38%
ALL TIME*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$973.07M$815.70M$896.70M
$118.76M$101.82M$122.06M

QRVO vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QRVO
Qorvo, Inc.
7.17%20.85%-37.90%24.24%-42.04%-5.94%43.05%91.39%-8.81%26.30%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
8.78%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QRVO and CDNS is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between QRVO and CDNS has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QRVO:

$7.99B

CDNS:

$93.78B

EPS

QRVO:

$4.32

CDNS:

$5.03

PE Ratio

QRVO:

20.96

CDNS:

67.57

PEG Ratio

QRVO:

0.19

CDNS:

5.15

PS Ratio

QRVO:

2.30

CDNS:

15.95

PB Ratio

QRVO:

2.33

CDNS:

10.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

QRVO:

$3.64B

CDNS:

$5.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QRVO:

$1.76B

CDNS:

$5.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

QRVO:

$708.89M

CDNS:

$1.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRVO vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QRVO
QRVO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QRVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QRVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRVO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QRVO vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRVOCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.00

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.23

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

-0.47

+1.12

QRVO vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRVO Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRVO and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRVO vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRVO drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVO and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRVOCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-93.13%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.76%

-28.85%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.68%

-29.05%

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.95%

-29.59%

-44.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-32.12%

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.61%

-18.34%

-36.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.16%

-39.52%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.76%

14.40%

-1.64%

Volatility

QRVO vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) is 9.74%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that QRVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRVOCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

13.74%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.00%

33.00%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.33%

39.53%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.39%

36.66%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.94%

34.29%

+7.65%

Dividends

QRVO vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither QRVO nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QRVO vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Qorvo, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

QRVO vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Qorvo, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

QRVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 400.97M and revenue of 784.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.52B and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.0%.

QRVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported an operating income of 96.77M and revenue of 784.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 450.32M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

QRVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Qorvo, Inc. reported a net income of 85.80M and revenue of 784.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 367.08M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QRVO and CDNS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDNS has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to QRVO (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRVO dropped -74.54% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

QRVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRVO and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer