PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFS vs. ON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFS vs. ON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GFS having a 62.92% return and ON slightly lower at 60.11%.


GFS

1D
-1.17%
1M
-33.72%
6M
37.95%
YTD
62.92%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
-3.72%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.12%

ON

1D
-0.77%
1M
-28.71%
6M
43.71%
YTD
60.11%
1Y
42.79%
3Y*
-4.25%
5Y*
18.65%
10Y*
24.67%
ALL TIME*
4.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFS vs. ON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
62.92%-18.62%-29.19%12.45%-17.05%38.23%
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
60.11%-14.12%-24.52%33.93%-8.17%52.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and ON is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.69

The correlation between GFS and ON has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFS:

$31.17B

ON:

$33.74B

EPS

GFS:

$1.39

ON:

$1.43

PE Ratio

GFS:

40.92

ON:

60.67

PS Ratio

GFS:

4.65

ON:

5.74

PB Ratio

GFS:

2.73

ON:

4.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFS:

$6.84B

ON:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFS:

$1.81B

ON:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

GFS:

$2.16B

ON:

$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFS vs. ON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS
GFS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ON
ON Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ON Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ON Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ON Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFSONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.22

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.14

2.65

+0.50

GFS vs. ON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the ON Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and ON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFS vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum ON drawdown of -96.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and ON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFSONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.53%

-96.34%

+34.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.76%

-35.26%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.36%

-70.44%

+18.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.76%

-35.26%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-53.81%

+19.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.10%

16.20%

-3.10%

Volatility

GFS vs. ON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) is 20.69%, while ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a volatility of 34.80%. This indicates that GFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFSONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.69%

34.80%

-14.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.32%

53.11%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.61%

62.87%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.67%

55.28%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.67%

51.99%

-0.32%

Dividends

GFS vs. ON - Dividend Comparison

GFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while ON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Financials

GFS vs. ON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.63B
1.51B
(GFS) Total Revenue
(ON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFS vs. ON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
27.6%
38.5%
Portfolio components
GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

ON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

ON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

ON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GFS and ON have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ON has higher volatility (34.80%) compared to GFS (20.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs ON's -96.34%.

GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFS and ON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer