PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ON vs. LSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ON vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ON achieves a 66.89% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 77.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ON has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 25.41%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 36.27% annualized return.


ON

1D
-5.83%
1M
-22.62%
6M
53.82%
YTD
66.89%
1Y
51.30%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
25.41%

LSCC

1D
-4.87%
1M
-9.54%
6M
57.33%
YTD
77.68%
1Y
143.37%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
36.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ON vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
66.89%-14.12%-24.52%33.93%-8.17%107.52%34.25%47.67%-21.16%64.11%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
77.68%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ON and LSCC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2000

0.52

The correlation between ON and LSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ON:

$35.17B

LSCC:

$17.91B

EPS

ON:

$1.43

LSCC:

$0.14

PE Ratio

ON:

63.24

LSCC:

908.06

PS Ratio

ON:

5.98

LSCC:

31.45

PB Ratio

ON:

4.88

LSCC:

24.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

ON:

$6.06B

LSCC:

$574.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ON:

$2.26B

LSCC:

$383.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

ON:

$1.21B

LSCC:

$65.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ON vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ON
ON Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ON Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ON Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ON Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ON vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONLSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

7.46

-5.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

20.46

-17.14

ON vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ON Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ON and LSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ON vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ON drawdown since its inception was -96.34%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ON and LSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONLSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.34%

-97.34%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.87%

-19.33%

-14.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.44%

-61.09%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.44%

-61.09%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.44%

-61.09%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.52%

-15.80%

-16.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.82%

-55.02%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.52%

7.04%

+8.48%

Volatility

ON vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a higher volatility of 36.53% compared to Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) at 21.57%. This indicates that ON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONLSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.53%

21.57%

+14.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.10%

45.76%

+7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.59%

57.59%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.27%

54.90%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.95%

50.87%

+1.08%

Dividends

ON vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ON nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ON vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ON Semiconductor Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.51B
170.90M
(ON) Total Revenue
(LSCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ON vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ON Semiconductor Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
38.5%
68.8%
Portfolio components
ON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

ON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

ON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ON and LSCC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ON has higher volatility (36.53%) compared to LSCC (21.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ON dropped -96.34% vs LSCC's -97.34%.

LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ON and LSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer