GFOF vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. GFOF is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

GFOF vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 94.18%
• YTD: 90.91%
• 6M: 10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	90.91%	-6.67%

Return for Risk

GFOF vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFOF	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.99	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GFOF	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-77.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-9.09%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFOF	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	206.19%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	206.19%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	206.19%	—

GFOF vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFOF vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFOF nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GFOF or CIFU?

On fees, GFOF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFOF or CIFU?

GFOF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFOF or CIFU?

GFOF and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GFOF and CIFU?

GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 1.50% for CIFU.