GFOF vs. PYPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL).
GFOF is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2022.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFOF or PYPL.
Correlation
The correlation between GFOF and PYPL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GFOF vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
GFOF
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
PYPL
-12.19%
-16.47%
4.53%
26.69%
-8.46%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFOF vs. PYPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GFOF
PYPL
GFOF vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFOF vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFOF nor PYPL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
GFOF vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) is 0.00%, while PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) has a volatility of 15.44%. This indicates that GFOF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.