PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GFOF vs. PYPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GFOF and PYPL is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

GFOF vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
44.68%
51.47%
GFOF
PYPL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GFOF:

1.23

PYPL:

1.26

Sortino Ratio

GFOF:

2.01

PYPL:

1.78

Omega Ratio

GFOF:

1.23

PYPL:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

GFOF:

1.40

PYPL:

0.52

Martin Ratio

GFOF:

4.05

PYPL:

6.59

Ulcer Index

GFOF:

18.37%

PYPL:

6.48%

Daily Std Dev

GFOF:

60.24%

PYPL:

33.87%

Max Drawdown

GFOF:

-75.18%

PYPL:

-83.67%

Current Drawdown

GFOF:

-0.28%

PYPL:

-71.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFOF achieves a 60.08% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's 43.71% return.


GFOF

YTD

60.08%

1M

2.91%

6M

43.96%

1Y

51.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PYPL

YTD

43.71%

1M

1.71%

6M

48.74%

1Y

42.71%

5Y*

-4.28%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFOF vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GFOF, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.871.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for GFOF, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.621.78
The chart of Omega ratio for GFOF, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.191.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for GFOF, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.970.74
The chart of Martin ratio for GFOF, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.826.59
GFOF
PYPL

The current GFOF Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFOF and PYPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.87
1.26
GFOF
PYPL

Dividends

GFOF vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

GFOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while PYPL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023
GFOF
Grayscale Future of Finance ETF
4.56%4.08%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GFOF vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFOF drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFOF and PYPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.28%
-33.43%
GFOF
PYPL

Volatility

GFOF vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) have volatilities of 9.66% and 9.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.66%
9.41%
GFOF
PYPL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab