GFOF vs. BITQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ).
GFOF and BITQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFOF is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2022. BITQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. It was launched on May 11, 2021. Both GFOF and BITQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GFOF vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFOF vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.08% | 145.49% | -68.58% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | -5.92% | 18.00% | 46.97% | 246.83% | -78.04% |
Returns By Period
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -8.31%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- 48.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFOF vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFOF vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
GFOF
BITQ
GFOF vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFOF | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.05 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between GFOF and BITQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GFOF vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFOF nor BITQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
Drawdowns
GFOF vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFOF | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -90.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -42.16% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -53.86% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.87% | — |
Volatility
GFOF vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFOF | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 58.97% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 67.77% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 67.77% | — |