PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIZX vs. GDMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than GDMYX's 6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GGIZX has outperformed GDMYX with an annualized return of 6.39%, while GDMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.70% annualized return.


GGIZX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.94%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.74%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
6.39%

GDMYX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.49%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.52%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
5.35%12.49%8.34%12.32%-15.60%6.94%10.66%17.36%-4.88%12.31%
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
6.31%10.46%11.71%11.43%-25.87%12.14%10.04%19.79%-2.69%11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and GDMYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.89

The correlation between GGIZX and GDMYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. GDMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMYX
GDMYX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GDMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIZXGDMYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.24

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.16

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.77

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.77

13.47

-2.70

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the GDMYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and GDMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIZXGDMYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.24

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.22

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.47

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than GDMYX's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and GDMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIZXGDMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-29.89%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-5.95%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-16.58%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-29.89%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-29.89%

+8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-5.69%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.22%

+0.10%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) at 1.59%. This indicates that GGIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIZXGDMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

1.59%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.43%

5.67%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.70%

7.37%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

12.42%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

12.24%

-3.55%

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMYX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIZX vs. GDMYX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, less than GDMYX's 9.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
9.61%10.22%10.00%2.28%0.00%10.65%3.09%5.76%5.36%4.63%0.00%0.00%
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.80%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GGIZX and GDMYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGIZX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to GDMYX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs GDMYX's -29.89%.

GDMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIZX and GDMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer