GFIZX vs. CONWX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX).
GFIZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. CONWX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 3, 1987.
Performance
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund | -2.20% | 9.46% | 6.69% | 8.80% | -10.17% | 3.82% | 6.93% | 10.74% | -2.13% | 7.11% |
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 8.18% | 11.95% | 13.58% | 0.20% | -2.51% | 19.73% | 8.76% | 16.84% | -1.95% | 7.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFIZX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has underperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 3.94%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.
GFIZX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
CONWX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFIZX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank
GFIZX
CONWX
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFIZX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.70 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.36 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.99 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 11.30 | -5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFIZX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.70 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.74 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.78 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFIZX and CONWX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison
GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.82% | 5.69% | 4.75% | 3.73% | 4.69% | 3.63% | 2.89% | 4.47% | 3.27% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 7.25% |
CONWX Concorde Wealth Management Fund | 3.41% | 3.69% | 10.55% | 2.16% | 7.85% | 3.63% | 3.86% | 2.16% | 5.09% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and CONWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFIZX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -26.09% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -8.60% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.03% | -12.49% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.03% | -26.09% | +12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -2.03% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -2.78% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.52% | -0.59% |
Volatility
GFIZX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) have volatilities of 2.06% and 2.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFIZX | CONWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.12% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 5.43% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 10.70% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 10.26% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 11.15% | -5.82% |