GFI vs. WDH
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and WDH (Waterdrop Inc.) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while WDH operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, GFI returned 32.03%/yr vs -27.99%/yr for WDH. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. WDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly higher than WDH's -24.98% return.
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
WDH
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -11.39%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -20.37%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- -14.35%
- 5Y*
- -27.99%
- 10Y*
- —
GFI vs. WDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 12.10% |
WDH Waterdrop Inc. | -24.98% | 66.25% | 19.17% | -68.77% | 141.30% | -86.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and WDH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between GFI and WDH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFI:
$32.65B
WDH:
$51.89M
GFI:
$5.39
WDH:
CN¥2.18
GFI:
6.78
WDH:
4.35
GFI:
0.11
WDH:
0.01
GFI:
2.34
WDH:
0.62
GFI:
3.87
WDH:
0.07
GFI:
$13.98B
WDH:
CN¥3.96B
GFI:
$7.34B
WDH:
CN¥2.02B
GFI:
$8.04B
WDH:
CN¥369.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. WDH — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
WDH
GFI vs. WDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | WDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.17 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 0.36 | +2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. WDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, roughly equal to the maximum WDH drawdown of -91.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and WDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | WDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -91.12% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.90% | -29.00% | -14.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -62.60% | +18.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -88.67% | +32.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.93% | -84.92% | +45.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -81.15% | +36.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 13.81% | +2.70% |
Volatility
GFI vs. WDH - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) at 13.33%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | WDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.70% | 13.33% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 24.40% | +22.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 44.58% | +15.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 61.87% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.90% | 62.73% | -7.83% |
Dividends
GFI vs. WDH - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than WDH's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
WDH Waterdrop Inc. | 4.29% | 2.63% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GFI vs. WDH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Waterdrop Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. WDH - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
WDH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a gross profit of 723.78M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
WDH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported an operating income of 82.71M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
WDH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a net income of 159.88M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and WDH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to WDH (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs WDH's -91.12%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and WDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer