WDH vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WDH (Waterdrop Inc.) is a stock, while SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Over the past 5 years, WDH returned -28.24%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for SIL. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WDH vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDH achieves a -21.77% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 4.75% return.

WDH

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -7.59%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -21.36%
• 1Y: 2.75%
• 3Y*: -11.69%
• 5Y*: -28.24%
• 10Y*: —

SIL

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 15.66%
• 1Y: 91.23%
• 3Y*: 49.15%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDH vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WDH Waterdrop Inc.	-21.77%	66.25%	19.17%	-68.77%	141.30%	-85.77%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	4.75%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WDH and SIL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021	0.14

The correlation between WDH and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WDH vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDH

WDH Risk / Return Rank: 42
WDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
WDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
WDH Omega Ratio Rank: 39
WDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
WDH Martin Ratio Rank: 43

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDH vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDH	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	1.83	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	2.17	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.30	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	2.79	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	7.14	-6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDH vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDH Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDH and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDH	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	1.83	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.36	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	0.14	-0.61

Drawdowns

WDH vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDH drawdown since its inception was -90.62%, which is greater than SIL's maximum drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDH and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDH	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.62%	-82.99%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.97%	-32.91%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.60%	-32.91%	-29.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.26%	-55.08%	-34.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.38%	-25.87%	-57.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.12%	-51.45%	-28.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.15%	12.82%	+0.33%

Volatility

WDH vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) is 13.75%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that WDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDH	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.75%	17.66%	-3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.24%	41.57%	-16.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.81%	50.01%	-5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.93%	39.21%	+22.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.87%	39.60%	+23.27%

Dividends

WDH vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

WDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than SIL's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.13%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%
WDH Waterdrop Inc.	4.11%	2.63%	5.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDH and SIL in my portfolio?

WDH and SIL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDH or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to WDH (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDH dropped -90.62% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.