GFI vs. TCOM
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and TCOM (Trip.com Group Limited) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TCOM operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 22.89%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TCOM. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. TCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -19.53% return, which is significantly higher than TCOM's -40.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed TCOM with an annualized return of 22.89%, while TCOM has yielded a comparatively lower 0.25% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -23.10%
- YTD
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 47.03%
- 3Y*
- 40.04%
- 5Y*
- 34.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.89%
TCOM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- 6M
- -43.43%
- YTD
- -40.48%
- 1Y
- -30.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 0.25%
GFI vs. TCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -19.53% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | -40.48% | 5.24% | 90.67% | 4.68% | 39.72% | -27.01% | 0.57% | 23.95% | -38.64% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and TCOM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
GFI:
$30.56B
TCOM:
$26.95B
GFI:
$5.39
TCOM:
CN¥45.41
GFI:
6.33
TCOM:
6.39
GFI:
0.10
TCOM:
0.04
GFI:
2.18
TCOM:
3.12
GFI:
3.62
TCOM:
1.20
GFI:
$13.98B
TCOM:
CN¥64.48B
GFI:
$7.34B
TCOM:
CN¥51.79B
GFI:
$8.04B
TCOM:
CN¥39.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. TCOM — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
TCOM
GFI vs. TCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | TCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.85 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.62 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | -1.24 | +3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. TCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than TCOM's maximum drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and TCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | TCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -76.34% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.66% | -49.54% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.66% | -49.54% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -49.54% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -71.96% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.88% | -45.80% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -27.89% | -16.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.83% | 24.98% | -5.15% |
Volatility
GFI vs. TCOM - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) at 16.28%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | TCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.88% | 16.28% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.77% | 31.02% | +16.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.30% | 38.00% | +23.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 49.47% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.77% | 44.42% | +10.35% |
Dividends
GFI vs. TCOM - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, while TCOM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.39% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
TCOM Trip.com Group Limited | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GFI vs. TCOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Trip.com Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. TCOM - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
TCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 12.80B and revenue of 16.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.5%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
TCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 3.92B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
TCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 16.11B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and TCOM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (19.88%) compared to TCOM (16.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs TCOM's -76.34%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and TCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer