PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. EXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFI vs. EXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -23.58% return, which is significantly lower than EXE's -13.81% return.


GFI

1D
-3.31%
1M
-3.88%
6M
-33.43%
YTD
-23.58%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
37.99%
5Y*
31.37%
10Y*
20.74%
ALL TIME*
6.40%

EXE

1D
1.74%
1M
4.98%
6M
-15.39%
YTD
-13.81%
1Y
-7.38%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$371.17M$368.49M$332.29M
$102.92M$118.13M$131.61M

GFI vs. EXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-23.58%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%21.76%
EXE
Expand Energy Corp
-13.81%14.35%33.18%-14.77%62.34%53.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and EXE is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

0.14

The correlation between GFI and EXE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFI:

$29.02B

EXE:

$21.77B

EPS

GFI:

$5.39

EXE:

$11.59

PE Ratio

GFI:

6.01

EXE:

8.11

PS Ratio

GFI:

2.07

EXE:

1.69

PB Ratio

GFI:

3.44

EXE:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFI:

$13.98B

EXE:

$13.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFI:

$7.34B

EXE:

$8.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

GFI:

$8.04B

EXE:

$6.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFI vs. EXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EXE
EXE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFI vs. EXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFIEXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

-0.26

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

-0.48

+2.18

GFI vs. EXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the EXE Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and EXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFI vs. EXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than EXE's maximum drawdown of -29.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and EXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIEXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.05%

-29.69%

-58.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.72%

-28.43%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.72%

-28.43%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

-29.69%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.76%

-22.60%

-23.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.24%

-11.35%

-32.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.70%

15.54%

+7.16%

Volatility

GFI vs. EXE - Volatility Comparison

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Expand Energy Corp (EXE) at 8.78%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIEXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

8.78%

+3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.19%

21.67%

+24.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.58%

30.55%

+31.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.84%

34.89%

+17.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.58%

34.64%

+19.94%

Dividends

GFI vs. EXE - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than EXE's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXE
Expand Energy Corp
3.39%2.89%2.45%4.70%10.16%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.68%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%

Financials

GFI vs. EXE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Expand Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GFI vs. EXE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Fields Limited and Expand Energy Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

EXE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.33B and revenue of 2.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.6%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

EXE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported an operating income of 661.00M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

EXE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a net income of 522.00M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GFI and EXE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFI has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to EXE (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs EXE's -29.69%.

GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFI and EXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer