GFF vs. WTS
GFF (Griffon Corporation) and WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GFF in Tools & Accessories, WTS in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, GFF returned 21.69%/yr vs 19.93%/yr for WTS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFF vs. WTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFF achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly lower than WTS's 28.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GFF has outperformed WTS with an annualized return of 21.69%, while WTS has yielded a comparatively lower 19.93% annualized return.
GFF
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- YTD
- 24.34%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 30.84%
- 5Y*
- 34.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.69%
WTS
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 23.03%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 1Y
- 39.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 19.93%
GFF vs. WTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 24.34% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 28.12% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -24.08% | 60.63% | 23.14% | 56.20% | -14.13% | 17.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFF and WTS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1986 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, GFF and WTS have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GFF:
$4.18B
WTS:
$11.77B
GFF:
$0.76
WTS:
$10.95
GFF:
119.88
WTS:
32.18
GFF:
1.55
WTS:
1.51
GFF:
1.78
WTS:
4.61
GFF:
44.08
WTS:
5.63
GFF:
$2.35B
WTS:
$2.56B
GFF:
$1.00B
WTS:
$1.26B
GFF:
$245.38M
WTS:
$556.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFF vs. WTS — Risk / Return Rank
GFF
WTS
GFF vs. WTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFF | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 2.44 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 6.14 | -4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFF vs. WTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFF drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than WTS's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFF and WTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFF | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.84% | -63.68% | -33.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.85% | -15.45% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.85% | -19.54% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.02% | -44.08% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.32% | -44.08% | -17.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -9.99% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.40% | -16.17% | -39.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.67% | 6.15% | +4.52% |
Volatility
GFF vs. WTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Griffon Corporation (GFF) is 12.27%, while Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that GFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFF | WTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.27% | 15.01% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.52% | 21.43% | +6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.79% | 26.60% | +10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.37% | 28.45% | +12.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.43% | 28.42% | +17.01% |
Dividends
GFF vs. WTS - Dividend Comparison
GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than WTS's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.92% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Financials
GFF vs. WTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Griffon Corporation and Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFF vs. WTS - Profitability Comparison
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
WTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
WTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
WTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFF and WTS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTS has higher volatility (15.01%) compared to GFF (12.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFF dropped -96.84% vs WTS's -63.68%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFF and WTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer